Re: Re: Which PEAR is correct
| From: | Stig S. Bakken | Date: | Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:09:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Which PEAR is correct | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev php.pear.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4590@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 11:40, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:31:31 +0100
> "Martin Jansen" <mail@martin-jansen.de> wrote:
>
> > Christian and Rui: Could you please take care that patches go to both
> > versions and that both versions contain the same code? Could one of
> > you (or Richard perhaps) bring both versions up to date?
> >
> > Steen: php4/pear will contain the PHP Foundation Classes (PFC) which
> > are some sort of glibc for PHP. /pear will contain all the other
> > packages, PECL code, Gtk apps etc. For more information on this
> > you may want to read
> > http://pear.php.net/manual/en/introduction.php.
>
> why do we have to maintain two versions? I am not quite sure (for now,
> its early in the morning ;) what this piece of code does, but IMHO a
> place for it can be found, either in PEAR or PFC, but not both.
PFC packages are found in PEAR, the difference is only in their status.
- Stig
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] This is a digitally signed message part signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] This is a digitally signed message part signature.asc