Re: Was MPL under consideration of good licenses for PEAR?

From: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:48:56 +0000
Subject: Re: Was MPL under consideration of good licenses for PEAR?
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-46428@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 4/24/07, Justin Patrin <papercrane@gmail.com> wrote:
We would of course love for Mozilla to be contributing packages to PEAR. The biggest problem with licenses is whether or not it allows commercial use. The second biggest is whether it is GPL compatible. The PHP License, for example, is not GPL compatible and so now it is either discouraged or not allowed (another thing the Group should decide). I know that Firefox had some recent license problems when it comes to the branding (Graydon explained some of this at the Monotone Summit). Would these apply to the MPL?
PHP license 3.0.1 fixed that iirc - Helgi

« previous php.pear.dev (#46428) next »