Re: Rejected Packages

--On April 25, 2007 10:22:56 AM -0500 Terra Frost <terrafrost@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Terra Frost <terrafrost@gmail.com> > To: pear-dev@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Rejected Packages > Date-Sent: April 25, 2007 11:22:56 AM > > Reproposing it should be sufficient. From the PEAR manual: > > Otherwise we are sorry to say, that the community has decided to reject > it. Have a look at their comments during proposal and vote stage to find > out why. Maybe you can rework your package and propose it again, but > please do not try to hand in a proposal the same way twice. > > source: > > http://pear.php.net/manual/en/newmaint.proposal.step3.php#newmaint.propos > al.step3.stage4 I think it was +3 and -1. So it failed for "lack of interest" -- not enough voting. I recall the last vote cast has some long comments list a number of issues. One of which had to do with marking obj methods/properties as private. and that spun off into a discussion. I think the devs (i know i did) stopping voting while that discussion spun on.... and then the pepr vote closed. -c