Re: Election results

--On May 1, 2007 11:06:04 AM -0700 Justin Patrin <papercrane@gmail.com> wrote: > This is currently being discussed between those elected. At the moment > the consensus is that the top 6 Group members will vote for the > seventh member and in the case of a tie Greg, as president, would > break the tie. +1 NEW THOUGHT: are we keeping minutes? Anything the president, or the pear group officially decide should be permanently recorded in public view. I don't care if they have closed discussions, but the outcome of all activities has to be transparent. FROM: Pear Group (or "President" or other entities we think of later... :) PRESENT: (list of names) DATE: (date of this item's being recorded) SUBJECT: Regarding the matter of the tie in the pear group elections on 1-May-2007 The 6, newly elected members, after informal discussion on the mailing list and iirc, have selected [WINNER] as the 7th member of the Pear group. Then every time one of the common Qs pops up on the mailing list. like, how many times have we discussed the E_NOTICE topic with the answers always being "it's somewhere in the CS, or look in the mail list archives..." the pres or pear group can just stamp it permanently into the minutes once and forever. AND then we can put in announcements of the new president (congrats greg!) and the new pear group to start (and each year when we elect. ) thoughts? -c