Re: usage of PEAR_Exception
| From: | Joshua Eichorn | Date: | Wed, 02 May 2007 20:08:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: usage of PEAR_Exception | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-46558@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Mark Wiesemann wrote:
Hi, Craig Constantine wrote:Such a section would also be fine, yes.--On May 2, 2007 8:39:36 PM +0200 Mark Wiesemann <wiesemann@php.net> wrote:or just immortalize them in an RFC section of the web site...versions to the manual.Instead of hiding these RFCs in PEPr, we should add them in shortened
moving them into the manual (as I understand it) requires a little more effort for someone.Such a move would have the benefit that somebody could review and summarize the RFCs. Too long texts have the risk that nobody will read them. Regards, Mark I don't think we really want to summarize something we already voted on. If its not clear from the RFC we need to put more work into writing RFCs. As far as an RFC section on the website goes, that would be a good idea, now we just need a patch to pearweb. -josh