Re: Services_Digg not valid?
| From: | Justin Patrin | Date: | Mon, 21 May 2007 00:11:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Services_Digg not valid? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-46842@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 5/20/07, Helgi Þormar <helgith@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/20/07, Gregory Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote: Helgi Þormar wrote:Experiment is really the wrong word. It's "develop". -- Justin PatrinmyYeah that sounds nice, tho I thought one had to do pear update pearweb,To update the website, all that is needed is a release of the pearweb package - no one needs access to the server. The same has always been true in the past, only those with commit karma could update the website, and then there was an hour wait. If you'd like to be a lead in order to do emergency releases, this can be arranged, since you're pretty durn active.bad if you had some automated system to do that.Helgi, Helgi - I thought you knew me better than that! I would never design a system that would be crippling in case of the absence of a super-admin ;). Well I believe that you are human, that's all ;-) Seriously though, the new system is fantastic exactly because it does not require a supreme level of trust to update the website, but it completely removes the danger of breaking everything with a simple CVS commit. This allows us to actually experiment in CVS. Yes I'm fine with the new system now since you made it like this :) So yeah I'm pretty happy that we can now experiment in CVS (tho I advice against it since it might break other peoples experiments ;D hehe)