Re: Re: Lack of recommended versions of setPhpDep()?

From: Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:10:56 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Lack of recommended versions of setPhpDep()?
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-47818@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Travis Swicegood wrote: > On Aug 20, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Gregory Beaver wrote: > >> Travis Swicegood wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> Is there any particular reason that PEAR_PackageFile_v2_rw::setPhpDep() >>> does not have a recommended version argument? It seems like for >>> continuity's sake it should have had it; but it also seems rather >>> useful. An example would be the recent issues with ext/JSON. If my >>> app >>> required its handling of UTF-8, it would have had issues with 5.2.1, >>> but >>> only rarely and probably not enough to completely exclude it. >> >> Because it is impossible to guess what the php dependency actually is >> for every project? In theory, a developer should know the minimum php >> version he/she is supporting. If not, well, perhaps there are other >> problems afoot :). In other words, PEAR is trying to make the >> absolutely necessary decisions and leave all others to the developer. > > Hey Greg, > > Sorry that you'll be getting this twice but I didn't see that you'd > CC'd PEAR on the response to me. > > The issue here is when you have code that works with - let's just say > 5.2.0 - 5.2.3. If your code relied for a small piece of functionality > on JSON that was compiled with 5.2.x, it would have had been broken in > certain versions. Unless you were distributing to people who used > lots of high ASCII UTF-8 you're app wouldn't really be broken in > 5.2.1, but there would be a fringe case. That doesn't quite seem like > a reason to completely exclude 5.2.1, but would definitely make a case > for recommending a newer version. Hi Travis, I misunderstood your request. I thought you meant an optional parameter to the php version for the setPhpDep() function, but you really meant adding a <recommended> tag to the php dependency (correct me if I'm wrong). The reason this doesn't happen is because the <recommended> tag is strictly enforced unless you pass --loose. In other words, you could only specify 1 PHP version that is recommended, and people with other versions, including newer ones, would have to use --loose (or worse, --force) to install. There is no way to specify that a new PHP version is compatible post-release, but there is a way to specify that a new package release is compatible post-release with the <compatible> tag. So, in short, <recommended> does not function the way you think it does (reading between the lines) and would not be appropriate for php version dependencies. Greg

« previous php.pear.dev (#47818) next »