Re: clarification on the performance of require_once andAPC

Alexey Borzov wrote:

And here we will know that there's our code running processed by our build script.

but also in other areas like the well known issue that many users report stuff like "on line xyz there is foobar".

I'd take a bug report with proper "actual output" vs. "expected output" over that with explicitly stated line numbers any day. The latter come out bogus too often. Not mentioning the fact that using the same build script on the same files will produce the same output.

So while debugging this issue you will want to modify the code, run the build script, test etc. I realize this can be automated, but I would rate it as a major inconvinience. Anyways, having users running different code under the same version scares the hell out of me. I guess it doesnt scare you or Till. At the same time you seem to be scared of code that does not come with hard coded includes. I guess we both have different childhood traumata. To me the decision is clear, to you guys it appears just as clear, just 180 degrees opposed to what I think. This was the conclusion last time as well, so I guess we will keep the status quo until someone documents the alternative in depth and we hold a vote (or whatever we are supposed to do in such a situation based on our constitution). regards, Lukas