Re: QF Supersession (Was: Re: [PEAR-DEV] HTML_Form superceded ?)
| From: | Alexey Borzov | Date: | Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:15:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: QF Supersession (Was: Re: [PEAR-DEV] HTML_Form superceded ?) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-48343@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Adam Harvey wrote:
We should, for at least 2 reasons 1) People starting new development may be more interested in bleeding edge 2) We don't want feature requests for superseded packages (especially for features that may be already implemented in new version). The wording may be improved a bit, of course, since people who expect full QuickForm functionality can not yet use QuickForm2.Now it's linking to QF which itself has a "superceded by" message :)Side question: should we be telling people a package is superseded by an alpha package (in this case, HTML_QuickForm2, which is at a 0.2.0 stage)?