Re: PEAR activity stats

On 11/26/07, Bertrand Mansion <golgote@mamasam.com> wrote: > > > Le 25 nov. 07 à 19:47, Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson a écrit : > > > On 11/25/07, Christian Weiske <cweiske@cweiske.de> wrote: > >> > >> Hello all, > >> > >> > >> I began to collect data for PEAR activity statistics, and got two > >> first > >> charts: > >> > >> http://fotostore.cweiske.de/screenshots/posts-by-month.png > >> > >> http://fotostore.cweiske.de/screenshots/releases-by-month.png > >> (Gesamtergebnis means "Sum" in this case) > >> > >> The first indicates that PEAR is slowly dying, while the second tells > >> us that the rate of releases are relatively constant. > > > > > > Doesn't the first graph just tell us that we have a lot less flamewars > > going on and when one starts that less people participate in it ? :) > > Probably true. I can start a flamewar next month just to make sure :) > It would also be interesting to see a graph about the evolution of > new proposals (outside of the Services category...). This would be > more worrying I think Yay finally some wars, perhaps I won't be bored at work anymore! :) The pepr stuff would be interesting indeed, we can probably extract most of the info from the pear-dev list since IIRC we don't keep any proper change history in the database beside what the author comments, I think we don't even have a history for when X proposal when from proposal stage to vote or such, only the mails to pear-dev, perhaps we should change that, we're doing it anyway for the bug tracker (and about time mind you). Christian, would it be viable to make a script to extract these information into a database from the ML until we start logging it our selfs on the pearweb side ? A trend graph would be cool and just some general stats about pepr to see how we can improve it in PEAR2, the process in general. - Helgi