Re: Re: PEAR_PackageFileManager Roadmap

Laurent Laville wrote: > I don't think it's a risky business (move) to finish an incompleted > package unit tested under another testing framework (like PHPUnit) > > 1. because all PFM 1 will still stay as .phpt which can now also be > proceed by PHPUnit > 2. because I only want to write unit tests for PFM 2 which was still > un-tested since a long time > 3. my other remarks about deprecated package xml 1.0 (and of course PFM 1) > 4. I don' know another volonteer (than me) until now to build unit tests > suite and fix all bugs/requests awaiting , and you ? It's also going to force the users to run the run-tests command twice just to test the thing. My vote is either move everything to PHPUnit or stay with .phpt, having 2 test styles in a single package makes no sense from a developer or a user perspective. Note that I moved the tests from PHPUnit to .phpt a few years ago because it was easier to debug the tests. In addition, PHPUnit had broken BC causing some of the tests to fail that had worked in the past. Greg