Re: New package proposal

Dan Hayes wrote:

I wrote code that is somewhat similar to db_dataobjects, but in my opinion, offers numerous advantages over db_dataobjects. It currently only works for postgresql (I don't think it wouldn't be that difficult to make it work with mysql also), but I've documented it, and there are lots of options. Its also very easy to get up and running and to update and modify. I'm not sure if this would be a good PEAR package, or if I should just continue developing it as is. Any feedback would be appreciated. http://www.ddataobjects.com

I don't mean to be rude here but I think you need more than just a vague paragraph explaining why you don't want to use MDB2... Nor have you even bothered to explain what the improvements over DB_DataObject are. To be frank, I don't think you'll get many people wasting their time sifting through your code to see if it'll be worth anything. -- David Sanders shangxiao