Re: Google Project for Services_Facebook

Joe Stump wrote:

On Apr 12, 2008, at 6:56 AM, David Coallier wrote:

Either someone from the PEAR Group or from QA (or both?). At any rate, anyone want to volunteer to be granted administrative access to Services_Facebook?

Oii; I can represent either one, I suspect Christian W would like access as well but I don't know his gmail account if any.

Add me then

I've already added Helgi, but I'd be happy to add another "just in case". Send me your Gmail / Google account. BTW, I think the rules, docs, etc. should be updated to require a PEAR representative (either QA or PEAR Group) be an administrator for any code hosted on Google Projects (or any code hosted on publicly available repositories). That's just me though. A notable exception is Services_Digg, which we maintain in-house for marketing reasons (we add new features to the site, which get new API endpoints, which get new code in Services_Digg. Obviously we don't always want that stuff public months/weeks in advance). Thoughts? --Joe I'm not sure what the best option is in that case. I think remaining flexible is a good approach. The biggest thing is giving QA a way to help out if code becomes unmaintained either permanently or for a shorter period of time. Maybe mirroring the source control info when a release happens?

-josh