About licences

Hi! I've been told it's better not to use PHP License when proposing a new package. What I find strange is that I initially used that license because is it written, on http://pear.php.net/manual/en/newmaint.proposal.php : > Each package has to be licensed under an accepted OpenSource license. If you are unsure about > the license, you should opt for the PHP License. The PEAR Group has issued a License Announcement, > which provides further details concerning this topic. So I suppose there is something wrong somewhere... Is really PHP License a good choice, or should the documentation be updated? Charles.