Re: HTML_Progress and HTML_Progress2

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Christian Weiske <cweiske@cweiske.de> wrote: > Hello Laurent, > >> As I'm expected, following PEAR group recommandation to add package xml >> v2, the QA release of HTML_Progress 1.2.6 have generated more download >> (57) than HTML_Progress2 (31) > Could that be due to upgrade-all calls of installed HTML_Progress (1) versions? That is the most likely culprit yeah - We don't log what command is does which request, would be nice but well privacy and all that I guess :-) Laurent - Maybe you'd want to email this to pear-general, maybe not with the whole dropping v3 and support for all HTML_Progress, seems a bit excessive and might scare some users but if you just ask who are still using v1 and why they are using it then I'm sure people will be more than happy to tell you if they are subscribed to the list. But well I think it's upgrade-all stuff going on, especially if someone wrote a download-all script that also installs all the latest version of each package (think web hosts) - best way to monitor this is to give the newest v1 release a bit more time and see if downloads go down in the next week or two. Regards Helgi