Re: PEAR Coding Standards question
| From: | Kevin van Zonneveld | Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:11:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Coding Standards question | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-50568@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [1] - http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=99
> The most helpful comment on that RFC that helps me understand the overall
> decision against underscores was from Justin -- "As protected members may be
> declared public in extending classes, it makes sense to me to not force
> protected members to be prefixed."
Thanks Chuck, that certainly clarifies things.
My argument would not be to force the prefixing of protected members.
But to allow it.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
Kevin van Zonneveld
http://kevin.vanzonneveld.net