Re: GIT in pear
| From: | Joshua Eichorn | Date: | Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:03:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: GIT in pear | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-50943@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Joe Stump wrote:
On Oct 27, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:@version $Id$ type stuff in the coding standard. I think we should just update the standard to say a version identifier from your scm and give an example for cvs/svn -joshOn Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:06 AM, till <till@php.net> wrote:I don't believe we need to do anything. PEAR doesn't care where you house your code. Digg has one package whose source isn't even available publicly due to product concerns (we add new features to the API to support new products and don't, obviously, want the public knowing about them before the release). We also use Google Code for a number of other things. --Joe I think we are talking aboutA general question, do we need to extend the PEAR coding standard in order to allow GIT?I for one welcome our new version control overlords.