RE: [PEAR-DEV] [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Amendment of Docblock Comment Standards

> Hi, > > Jorrit Schippers wrote: > > I think the original issue was that comment related CS were > littering the > > output of phpcs with errors such that the code related CS > issues became > > hard to spot. I think this proposal is a bad solution to > this problem. > > PHP_CodeSniffer could be adapted such that one can > distinguish between > > these two classes of problems. > > The problem is, there can be genuine phpdoc errors in the > output, like missing a > @param tag for a parameter. Your proposal won't quite help > here, they'll be as > hard to spot as they are now. I overlooked that. In that case, we can better agree on a more granular error level and decrease the error level of some of the warnings that currently have the same level as really imporant warnings. -- Jorrit