Re: Coding Standard Question

On a related note, can anybody please tell me what happened to the 'Prefixing protected methods with underscores' discussion? The PEAR group has decided: http://wiki.pear.php.net/index.php/MeetingMinutes20080824#Underscore_prefix_on_private_.28protected.3F.29 But what has to be done next? On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su> wrote: > Hi David, > > David Coallier wrote: >>> >>> This is something that stands for the current CS and I do agree that >>> it looks ugly. However there's a good news, Christian Weiske has >>> started a proposal in order to enhance the current coding standards[1] >>> and this very exact issue is covered. >> >> Classic, forgot the link.... >> >> [1]: http://short.ie/peprcs > > The very top of that document reads: >> >> The PEAR Group has voted and accepted this document. There will be no >> voting among developers. > > If that's the case, shouldn't it be at least linked from the CS part of PEAR > manual? > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, Kevin van Zonneveld http://kevin.vanzonneveld.net