Re: CodeSniffer throw warning for missing filedoc
| From: | Chuck Burgess | Date: | Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:11:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: CodeSniffer throw warning for missing filedoc | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-51277@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Christian Weiske <cweiske@cweiske.de>wrote:
> Hello Harley,
>
>
> > How would you feel about making the CodeSniffer throw warnings instead
> > of errors for missing filedoc comments?
> >
> > Having both class comment and filedoc comments can be redundant when
> > the file only contains 1 class, and nothing outside the class.
> >
> > Filedoc comments work well if the file contains multiple classes or
> > global code.
> >
> > From my own experience the filedoc is little more than a copy of the
> > class comment, with inline license text and the first line from the
> > class comment or the class name. It does not really add anything of
> > value.
>
> It is only redundant if you have no other code except the class - that
> is, no require/include calls, no global functions, no global constants
> etc.
>
If for no other reason, I'm sure this requirement stems from phpDocumentor
requiring it...
--
CRB