Re: DB_Mongo Package Proposal

Hello Kristina, > So, it seems like implementing MDB2_Driver_Mongo wouldn't be a good idea, > but let me know if I'm misunderstanding MDB2 or what you're suggesting. yes you are right. I didn't notice it was not a RDBMS. > Sorry, I thought I needed the DB prefix since it is in the Database > category.  I'll fix it. you can freely call it DB_Mongo or whatever you like. It was just a suggestion ;) but no, it does not need to begin with DB_ just because its in the DB category. At least as far as i understand it, but perhaps the QA team or someone else might give the final answer. Thats what the manual says: "The general syntax for package names is <Category>_<Name>. The value for <Category> should be chosen from a predefined list of categories that are available in PEAR (e.g. "HTTP", "Net", "HTML"). The second part is the name of the package (like "Upload", "Portscan", "Table"). " [1] But I wouldn't take it as a rule since many packages doesn't follow it: MDB2, Calendar, AsteriskManager, FSM, Inline_C etc. [1] http://pear.php.net/manual/en/developers.contributing.howto.php Regards, iGor.