Re: have anyone reviewed my files?

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Dmitri Snytkine <d.snytkine@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello! > > I submitted patches for Net_GeoIP awhile ago, but have not seen any comments > about it yet. > Net_GeoIP patch is not a new package, just a patch with some code > improvements In that case the maintainer needs to have a look. If they are not available/don't respond with a week or two, you could email them directly and CC pear-qa@ on your email. That usually speeds things up. If you're fixing bugs etc. pear-qa can commit your patches too and make a new release in case the maintainer doesn't have time/respond at all. Providing patches always helps for others to "judge" you (sounds harsh) and if you wanted to take over Net_GeoIP that would make things easier. > I also submitted a proposal for Event_Dispatcher2 and posted a link to a > finished package > > Just wondering, what is the usual timeframe for starting the votes on a new > submitted package? > I think there are some email issues with the Pepr system. Usually, it's kinda like that: You submit the package in Pepr, work on it, ask for comments (proposed) and then depending on the comments you can call for votes. It also helps to address requests/comments directly so the people who want a change vote in favour of your package once you addressed. I'm not sure if the system sends out email (again), so it might have been missed. Just double-check if you see an email on pear-dev@ and if not, just email the info yourself ("I've proposed this package, please take a look and comment."). Till