Re: [PEPr] +1 for PEAR::PEAR_TestListener
| From: | Laurent Laville | Date: | Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:04:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] +1 for PEAR::PEAR_TestListener | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-52272@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Bill Shupp a écrit :
Bill Shupp (http://pear.php.net/user/shupp) has voted +1 on the proposal for PEAR::PEAR_TestListener. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=601 Vote information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=601&handle=shupp This vote is conditional. The condition is: There are no unit tests and it does not pass PHPCodeSniffer.Hello Bill, I agree with you but at only 50% : - agree with first 50% : there are no unit tests - disagree with second 50% : it does not pass PHP_CodeSniffer If you don't read the thread I initialized two weeks ago [1], please read it carefully to understand why I consider it's PHPCS ready As Till, I've considered its a warning not an error. Probably Greg Sherwood (who has not yet reply to this post [1] on June 14) could confirm the warning position. Laurent [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.pear.devel/47426