Re: Keeping pear-core mailing list?

On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Ken Guest<ken@linux.ie> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Christian Weiske <cweiske@cweiske.de>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> >> As many of you probably know do we have two cvs mailing lists: pear-cvs >> and pear-core. Commits to pear-core, pearweb, and pear2 go to both >> lists. >> That's a bit annoying to me and I would like to change that. Should we >> drop pear-core and rely on pear-cvs only? As far as I know, pear-core >> has been used for discussion about pear installer internals, but today >> pear-dev is and should be used since it's low traffic. >> >> What do you guys think? Drop pear-core? Limit it to pear-core only and >> do not send pear2 and pearweb to it? I definitely don't think they need to go to both lists, but I like that they have a separate purpose. Pyrus, pear-core, and pearweb have a separate audience, if we could target those commits to the correct list, I think that would be good. I'd prefer to get immediate commit emails for the core elements, and digests for general pear package commits, so two lists would be more flexible for me. -- Brett Bieber