Re: Killing off XML_Tree, or bringing it with us to PEAR2

> > Looking at the above, the only package worth rewriting is LiveUser, probably > LiveUser_Admin also... > >>  2. Version bump to package 2.0, lots of feature requests, kill it off >> slowly but still have it kicking around so pear2 likes it. I decided to give Option 2 a shot, because it was the least work, and meant that we could ignore the problem for as long as possible. Unfortunately, the latest version of XML_Tree is a BC break from the previous ones - at first glance, renaming the clone() method for obvious reasons, plus a few other minor bits of implementation. Nothing was tagged originally, so I can't easily diff. So, now there's a beta version of XML_Tree with a new package.xml 2.0 published at the moment, as a beta. There is 0% test coverage, and who knows what'll happen to lots of pear installations if I just pushed it out as 'stable' - I'm not gonna take the risk, etc etc etc. I don't suppose people want to update the deps for the other packages to be XML_Tree-2.0.0+, and test them as appropriate?