Re: Log2 Update

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Brandon Savage <brandon@brandonsavage.net>wrote: > On Sep 27, 2009, at 2:09 AM, Christian Weiske wrote: > > Hi Brandon, >> >> >> After much consideration, I've decided that the best course of >>> action for an E_STRICT compatible PHP 5 Log package is to simply >>> convert the existing log package. I'll be doing this over the next >>> week, and I'll post the code up for review. >>> >> Could you make that Log package for pear2? That would be something to >> get started with it. >> >> -- Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen >> Christian Weiske >> >> -= Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 =- >> > > Christian, > > Chuck and I talked about PEAR and PEAR2; he seemed to indicate at the time > that PEAR was a more stable set of standards than PEAR2. Has that changed? > > Brandon Christian, Brandon and I started talking about this back before the Group started really digging into the RFCs that affect the PEAR2 Standards. Also, one thing in my mind was that, knowing Brandon, a favorable PHP5 Log2 package would be ready fairly quickly, and I was partially counting on such a fresh PHP5 package as being a good early candidate for a transition to PEAR2 once the standards were settled. I'd planned to provide support for that work, so that I could get a real "on the job" working sense of what is required to move a PHP5 PEAR1 package to the PEAR2 standards. Lastly, with Brandon being a new PEAR dev, I didn't want him to feel any immediate pain by trying to write to the standards while parts are in flux. -- CRB