Re: Using the pear installer (or pyrus) as an applicationdeployment tool
| From: | Stephan Wentz | Date: | Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:32:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Using the pear installer (or pyrus) as an applicationdeployment tool | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-52987@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Am 28.10.2009 14:46, schrieb Greg Beaver:
Stephan Wentz wrote:Yea, did some performance testing with it. It works fine, and is nearly as fast as without phar, but it's really a hassle to maintain. Don't think this is an option for us. Hmm, or maybe... Can this setting be overriden by virtualhosts? Or is it a fixed value that's only allowed in the main php.ini? StephanDid you try enabling phar.cache_list? http://us.php.net/manual/en/phar.configuration.php#ini.phar.cache-list That tends to make performance much better, although it won't match APC outside of a phar, because all files must route through PHP and phar, losing some of the webserver efficiency.An alternative to this would be to distribute the contents as a phar which would preserve everything and prevent inadvertent modification.Phar was my first thought, too. But with that many components (and thus, phars) my tests really didn't produce very good performance - it was something like 3 times slower. APC was enabled, I didn't look deeper into this and why it's getting so slow. Did anyone here in this group run some tests with lots of phars (not only one)?