Re: MDB2 package status
| From: | Matthew Fonda | Date: | Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:40:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: MDB2 package status | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-54095@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Michael Gauthier <mike@silverorange.com> wrote:
> On 2011-02-16 05:34, A.L.E.C wrote:
>>
>> Hi! MDB2 is one of Top10 PEAR's packages. I'm woried about it's
>> development.
>>
>> Last stable release is almost 4 years old. There have been some fixes
>> since then, but applied only in 2.5 branch, so it's not so stable as it
>> should be after 4 years.
>>
>> Current development looks realy bad. It's very slow. There are many bugs
>> and has too high requirement (PHP5.3) which was considered as a bug here
>> on the list.
>>
>> I know it's a big package (including drivers), but maybe QA team could
>> take care on Top10 packages or sth?
>>
> I think another one of the problems is many of the key developers of MDB2
> have moved to developing Doctrine2. Does MDB2 still provide any advantages
> over using Doctrine? If not, perhaps we should just recommend people use
> that project for DBAL/ORM. They provide a PEAR channel and have good
> documentation and an active community.
>
> Cheer,
> Mike
I would love to see Doctrine2 (or any other good DBAL/ORM) become the
de facto standard for database access in PHP like PEAR::DB and MDB
once were. It would be nice if a more modern DBAL+ORM could actually
become part of PEAR, making it more of an "official" PHP project,
which I think was one of the main attractions of DB/MDB originally.
That is probably unlikely to happen, so I suppose just recommending to
discover channel and install something else would be the next best
thing.
Regards,
--Matthew