Re: PEPR for PEAR2

> > > > What would we need to change about PEPR to make it be "PEPR for > > PEAR2"? > Implement the PEAR2 rules for new packages :) Where exactly do those live? http://pear.php.net/pepr/index.php?filter=finished lists only a handful of RFCs Do you mean https://wiki.php.net/pear/rfc ? https://wiki.php.net/pear/rfc/pear2_class_naming - ratified https://wiki.php.net/pear/rfc/pear2_standards - expired draft https://wiki.php.net/pear/rfc/pear2_naming_standards - defunct https://wiki.php.net/pear/rfc/pear2_exception_policy ratified https://wiki.php.net/pear/rfc/pear2_versioning_standard_revision - draft I'm more than happy to implement changes or link to docs - I just need a bit of clarifty on what's considered current. > You know, having a > non-public channel for non-approved packages and less visibility for > non-approved ones. > > > > http://pear.php.net/manual/en/developers-newmaint.php > > Revamp of the new maintainers guide to reflect pear2 standards; > > expectations; building / testing your package with pyrus. > We should start a new manual/section for pear2. I'd not upgrade the old > one. > > +1