Re: Re: QuickForm2: messages and translations

From: Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 05:34:20 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: QuickForm2: messages and translations
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-54285@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hello Alexey, > >> A couple of questions Bertrand raised: > >> 1) Is get() a good enough method name? Won't it lead to name > >> conflicts in MessageProvider implementations? > > That depends on the message provider implementation. If it's a class > > with the single task of translating messages, get() is fine, maybe > > even "->_()" like the gettext function is called. > > If the class does several things, get() is obviously not the correct > > way. > > Yes, that part is understandable. The question is: how probable is a > class that will do several things at once? Not probable, except in bad written apps :) > I suspect message providers will be backed by some existing > translation / locale package. These packages tend to follow the > Factory pattern (see PEAR::Translation2, PEAR::I18Nv2) and it is hard > to create a subclass implementing HTML_QuickForm2_MessageProvider. > Proxy is much easier. Yep. > > By the way, this reminds me of specifying a callback instead of > > the message provider object - the method naming problem does not > > exist there. > > I think this will only work with PHP 5.3 and closures, as callback > will need to keep some state (i.e. messages it is going to return). > You definitely can instantiate an object and pass its method as a > callback, but then why not pass the whole object instead? It'd only free one from having a hard defined method name, nothing more. > >> 2) Is it OK that get() can return an array of messages rather > >> than a single message? Of course, if it can only return strings, > >> we'll need 12 get() calls in a loop in Date element for getting > >> the month names. > > I do think so. QF2 could even provide a proxy provider for > > simple message providers that don't accept multiple translation > > requests at once, while one can always supply a sophisticated one. > > OK, lets keep it that way, then. I'm with you here :) -- Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christian Weiske -=≡ Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 ≡=-

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc
« previous php.pear.dev (#54285) next »