Re: Soliciting Comments for VersionControl_Hg
| From: | Daniel O'Connor | Date: | Sat, 09 Jul 2011 16:04:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Soliciting Comments for VersionControl_Hg | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-54372@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Michael Gatto <mgatto@lisantra.com> wrote:
>
> Hi PEAR Devs,
>
> I advanced VersionControl_Hg to proposal status a couple weeks ago. I've
> had
> some feedback privately, but none officially since the status change.
>
> I think we're all poised to vote just about!
> One thing I could use help on is figuring out where to put the Docbook
> tutorials in the package's directory structure, and exactly what format
> they
> should be in (refentry or article, or...?). I use Pandoc, and am able to
> convert markdown tutorials to Docbook and then hand-finesse them into
> usable
> Docbook files.
>
http://pear.php.net/manual/en/developers.documentation.php
may be of some
help; as well as browsing http://svn.php.net/viewvc/pear/peardoc/trunk/
> Also, Changelogs: do these only go into the package.xml file or does PEAR
> support Unix-style CHANGELOG files in the root?
>
> We tend to push it into the package.xml primarily - but there's noting to
stop you from also including a CHANGELOG file in the package. As far as I
know no PEAR tools will pick up the content of it though.