Re: Proposal: Migrate unmaintained packages to github
| From: | Christian Weiske | Date: | Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:46:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Migrate unmaintained packages to github | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-54452@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Daniel,
> We've got a number of unmaintained packages:
> http://pear.php.net/qa/packages_orphan.php
>
> We regularly get requests from folks to take over packages; but it's
> a bit of a hassle to greet them; assess them; get them karma; etc.
> A lot of us are comfortable with git. The migration path is trivial
> (git-svn; update package source link; remove from pear svn); with the
> exception of losing the CI service without a bit of mucking around.
> Git removes much friction from accepting patches/etc; once you get
> over the initial learning curve.
>
> So... what would be compelling reasons *not* to migrate packages?
>
> All I've got so far:
> 1) Validate_* have a unique dir structure which would be a pain to
> untangle.
> 2) There's a lot of packages; most of them without open
> bugs; so why muck around with them
I follow reason 2 and would only migrate them when the need is apparent
(i.e. takeover) - it'd be too boring for me to migrate them all now.
--
Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Christian Weiske
-= Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 =-