Re: Pear Naming

On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 08:08:25PM -0300, Antonio Carlos Venancio Junior wrote: > On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 19:58, Christian Dickmann wrote: > > I think this could be useful: > > pear_include("net.webservices.google"); > > > > I don't know how to handle this in CVS, > > but I think for the enduser it is a good thing > > to have this kind of hierarchy. > > > Nice idea. So the dir structure will follow this? Nope. Every pear package needs to be in the root to express the independed nature of the pear packages. The package can be depented of one or more pear classes. But for the web interface this could the a good categorization. But i must say that net.webservices looks like a .NET namespace and i don't know what problems we could get with microsft if we're using this namespace. Most charateristics of microsoft such as .NET namespace are mostly registered somewhere. So than it would be net/webservices/google. That a directory structure and nobody can register that (i hope..) Dave Mertens