services_openstreetmap and a new geo category
| From: | Ken Guest | Date: | Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:17:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | services_openstreetmap and a new geo category | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-54836@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Guys,
Services_openstreetmap is now through the PEPR process
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=667.
As I think it would be more appropriate for it to be in a new Geo category
that I'd mentioned during the PEPR process I was wondering what the next
step would be?
Robert McLeod's create_kml proposal (
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=616
) would also be a
good fit for this category. Potentially the Map_Projection proposal, if it
comes to completion, could fit into this category too. So this new geo
category wouldn't be just a vanity category with just one package inside it.
The project is hosted on github and I know I can just rename the repository
from Services_Openstreetmap to Geo_OpenStreetMap - but the simplest
approach isn't always necessarily the best. Are there any PEAR RFCs for
this scenario?
Opinions?
thanks
Ken
--
http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/