Re: Hosting PEAR's git repositories on git.php.net
| From: | Bertrand Mansion | Date: | Sun, 09 Sep 2012 08:24:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Hosting PEAR's git repositories on git.php.net | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-55041@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le 7 sept. 2012 à 14:48, Alexey Borzov a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 29.08.2012 12:14, Christian Weiske wrote:
>> I'd like to see that for PEAR, too:
>> Using git.php.net as main repository server for PEAR packages, PEAR2
>> packages, Pyrus and infrastructure code.
>> Github would only be a mirror of the git.php.net code.
>>
>> What do you say? Do you have objections against it? Do you favor it?
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Git is supposed to be, well, distributed, so I don't understand this emerging github
> monoculture.
Thanks Christian for starting the discussion, the only Subversion-managed code I have left is from
Pear and it pretty annoying to use.
+1 from me as well.
-1 for having Github as a full mirror because :
- Github is not open source
- It seems complex to deal with administrative tasks for a group like Pear
- Code in the Github pear organization is not visible on main Github account
- I receive many mails from Pear organization about projects I am not concerned about
- It duplicates Pear features like the bug report tool, wiki
- It lacks mail diffs and feature evolution depends on Github
So moving everything back to git.php.net sounds like the best idea. Then, individually, we can do
what we want and use Github or Gitorious or Google Code, etc if we want. And if we have time, we can
build something around git.php.net to make it even more useful (pull requests, history browser,
comments in commits ...)
--
Bertrand Mansion
http://www.mamasam.com