[PEPr] +1 for Authentication::JWT

Christian Weiske (http://pear.php.net/user/cweiske) has voted +1 on the proposal for Authentication::JWT. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=688 Vote information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=688&handle=cweiske This vote is conditional. The condition is: - _handleJsonError misses @throws - tests: testDecodeFromPython assert parameters are in the wrong order - use exception codes so exceptions can be distinguished programmatically - I'm not fully happy with the "all static methods" approach, even if it may be fine here. Smells a bit. Does it make sense to have an JWT object and pre-set the key, so that I can encode/decode multiple tokens? - use static:: instead of JWT:: - the tests don't really test the encoding/decoding functionality except the python test. All others just work by $str = decode(encode($str)) - so I could replace the implementation with anything, and it would work - why are all (except one) methods public? - why is the one method private and not protected?