Bug #16655 Updated: Function for checking if email-adress is valid
| From: | hholzgra@php.net | Date: | Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:24:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Bug #16655 Updated: Function for checking if email-adress is valid | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-5637@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ID: 16655
Updated by: hholzgra@php.net
Reported By: metz@speedpartner.de
Status: Closed
Bug Type: PEAR related
Operating System: Linux
PHP Version: 4.1.2
New Comment:
a public mail server for a domain
that does operate *without* MX records
does not deserve to be taken serious IMHO
how do you implement fallback servers without
MX records?
and even if you say and A or CNAME record is
enough, how do you check that the machine with
that ip does really accept mail? by probing
the SMTP port all the time?
hartmut@www.six.de might be a legal address by
the CNAME rule, but i can assure you that mail
to that address will never reach me
so no MX -> no mail makes sense IMHO
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2002-04-17 20:32:40] cox@php.net
It's wrong to only check the MX address as many domains don't have it
(it's not a requirement). The CNAME has to be checked too.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2002-04-17 16:36:33] richard@php.net
There's already Mail/RFC822.php
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2002-04-17 16:19:24] mfischer@php.net
This belongs into PEAR (if at all).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2002-04-17 12:36:23] metz@speedpartner.de
you don't know how happy I am ;))
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2002-04-17 10:23:16] cynic@php.net
everything's possible, but PEAR is part of the "standard repertoire",
so you should be happy. :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
http://bugs.php.net/16655
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=16655&edit=1