Re: Contributing / DB_Object

(Alan) > you may want to look at > > > http://www.akbkhome.com/Projects/db_oo+-+an+object+based+Sql+builder+and+wr >apper+for+peardb/usage.html > I'm still trying to get more docs up, but this design is more object > based, most of the methods take no arguments, and usually no more than > two are in the core class.. > IMO the design you had is not really taking much advantage of > class/objects, rather just wrapping functions in classes.. (but I'm no > expert :) You are right. But in my case, I don't really need to advantages of class/object. Maybe, i can add a constructor in order to remove the $db from the arguments of methods. But... in the most of uses, it add one line to write for user. But I'm very surprised by the class db_oo. It seems to be excellent (when i look to the examples). Why is this class not in PEAR CVS ??? Why is this class not in PEAR packages ??? Is there a roadmap for PEAR (Thinks to do...) ? And who decides to add a new package or even a new cvs account ? Fabien, who has maybe worked for nothing :-( (fabien.marty@free.fr)