Re: [patch] Cache / File container

On Thu, 30 May 2002, MARTY Fabien wrote: > (Christian) > > Go ahead and commit it, if you think it's the solution (don't wanna be > > sarcastic about that, i just have no time to check it by myself :) ) > > Ok, because I think that you don't completly agree, I will commit it as an > experimental stuff. With a property of file container to decide if we use > file locking or not (default is false). Maybe that's an option :) i will test it on my projects as well. But the reason why i didn't completly agree is that your fix looks very easy and I don't know, why we didn't include something simple like that back then when we wrote that class. But i really can't remember the reason, why we didn't use flock(), and we maybe didn't see the obvious :) > And I'm going to continue to test it and if it's still correct, I will change > the default value to true. yep, do that. and don't wait to long, i also think, locking i badly needed :) chregu -- christian stocker | bitflux GmbH | schöneggstrasse 5 | ch-8004 zurich phone +41 1 240 56 70 | mobile +41 76 561 88 60 | fax +41 1 240 56 71 http://www.bitflux.ch | chregu@bitflux.ch | gnupg-keyid 0x5CE1DECB