Re: [fastCache] Name
| From: | Alan Knowles | Date: | Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:36:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [fastCache] Name | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-7890@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
should it follow the naming standards? ???
i thought that would mean
Cache_Fast
Cache_Simple
regards
alan
Bertrand Mansion wrote:
le 23/07/02 3:14, MARTY Fabien à fabien.marty@free.fr a écrit :The mainly problem is now the name of the class/package ? Ideas ?- simpleCache - easyCache - fileCache Or as suggested by Martin, if we keep fastCache and there is a new cache class, which is faster, it could be called fasterCache. But if someone comes up with a faster cache class again, it could then be called evenFasterCache or aBitMoreFasterCache or fasterThanFasterCache or evenFasterThanFasterCache... Ah Ah ! Bertrand Mansion Mamasam