Re: Binary extensions via PECL
| From: | Shane Caraveo | Date: | Fri, 26 Jul 2002 23:51:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Binary extensions via PECL | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-8039@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Martin Jansen wrote:
On Fri Jul 26, 2002 at 08:5907PM +0300, Marko Karppinen wrote:mirror will have to decide whether to mirror the win32 stuff depending on their local/national laws on encryption. Shaneon 26.7.2002 20:47, Martin Jansen at mail@martin-jansen.de wrote:That sounds ok for me. Go for it. So how do you handle legal issues for distributing ssl binaries? EachI'm pulling this out of my ass, but I'd say that 95% or more of our Windows users are using the ready-made PHP binaries. I guess this means that we can solve the issue on Windows also.- After this change the OpenSSL extension will be a significant enabler of the PEAR/PECL infrastructure. It should be on by default (if the host has OpenSSL installed).What's with Windows? Does it support OpenSSL "by default"?