Re: package proposal: XSLT_Wrapper

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 23:37:08 +0200 (CEST) Christian Stocker <chregu@bitflux.ch> wrote: > Hi > > +1 from me too. > > I just miss > > PEAR_XSLT_MODE_DOM > > as the dom/xslt extension can handle domxml dom trees directly and it > makes no sense to serialize a domtree to a string and then parse it back > in the wrapper backend. But i didn't look at the code, maybe you did > already think about that :) For other extensions, which do not understand > DOM trees, there's alwys the possibility to serialize it. Currently I take the xml tree from a file or from mem (variables), I ve planned to add native DOM tree to this backend later :-) (if someone need to convert a fresh XML doc ;) ). Then it returns the transformation or stores it to files. I use this way while trying to create a 'transparent' XSLT api making your apps runs well without taking care about the extensions installed or not. There is still a lot of work to make it nice & efficient ;-) thx,