Re: DB stuff
| From: | Colin Viebrock | Date: | Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:44:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: DB stuff | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-98@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> The fetchmode has to be hardcoded to DB_FETCHMODE_ASSOC here, or your
> object won't contain much. Also, if fetchInto() returns an object, an
> error should be raised. :-)
I understand your first comment ... yeah, I meant to say that. :)
I don't understand the last point though. If fetchInto() *does* return
an object, are we using that as the indication there was an error?
Instead of:
if (is_object($res)) {
Why not:
if ($res !== DB_OK) {
(Although there is a condition where the fetchInto will fail, and return
NULL instead of an error ... don't know how we want to catch that)
> If "->" somehow pleases you more than "[]", fine. I still don't
> see
> the point in having objects without methods instead of assocs. :-)
Yeah, well ... it's mostly a back-porting thing. I agree that there is
no advantage, except it makes code look a bit cooler sometimes. ;)
- Colin