Re: Adding a "Perm" category

> > A category called Perm? Was this really agreed upon? This is a very bad > > category name IMO. > > Well, at least this was the category name that everyone agreed on to use > in CVS ("Perm_Liveuser"). I don´t particularly like it either. > Of course we could use another category for the package release but then > why use "Perm" in CVS in the first place? Looking through the archives I could only find two real advocates of Perm. > > IMO LiveUser would be best placed in Auth. Also, considering that the > > website has the fuller title of "Authentication", I think this would > > be most peoples first port of call when looking for Authentication, > > User management, or Authorisation code (not that most people would > > make a particularly big distinction between any of those...). > > I´d like that much better, too. But I wouldn´t really like to change the > name in CVS as if I´m correct this is only possible by removing the > whole directory tree and adding it again under a new name - which would > mean losing CVS history? Like Arnaud already mentioned, this can be done without losing the history. Martin: You can do this yes? -- Richard Heyes