cvs: peardoc /en/guide/developers meaning.xml

mj Sun Mar 14 14:32:31 2004 EDT Modified files: /peardoc/en/guide/developers meaning.xml Log: * Having "unique" APIs across different packages does not make sense. Instead "consistent" is a more appropriate term. http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/peardoc/en/guide/developers/meaning.xml?r1=1.3&r2=1.4&ty=u Index: peardoc/en/guide/developers/meaning.xml diff -u peardoc/en/guide/developers/meaning.xml:1.3 peardoc/en/guide/developers/meaning.xml:1.4 --- peardoc/en/guide/developers/meaning.xml:1.3 Wed Mar 12 05:37:09 2003 +++ peardoc/en/guide/developers/meaning.xml Sun Mar 14 14:32:30 2004 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?> -<!-- $Revision: 1.3 $ --> +<!-- $Revision: 1.4 $ --> <!-- WORK IN PROGRESS, THERE IS PROBABLY LITTLE POINT IN TRANSLATING THIS DOCUMENT YET. @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ PEAR only accepts contributed code which is of high quality and which is compliant to the <link linkend="standards">PEAR Coding Standards</link>. For you this means that you are using - code that has a more or less unique API, is based on the same + code that has a more or less consistent API, is based on the same standard components and provides the same error reporting mechanism everywhere. </para>