Re: Feature Request: deeper TOC for pear.php.net manual
| From: | Alexander Merz | Date: | Thu, 01 May 2003 09:57:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Request: deeper TOC for pear.php.net manual | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.doc php.pear.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-doc+get-713@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Greg Beaver wrote:
In addition, do the template engines in PEAR really require HTML to work? Why not put them into a category called "Templates" or "Template Engines?" Math/Numbers should be combined into one category, or differentiated more. It would no problem to write, but this is the best way to confuse users.Also you lost a big advantage: an automatic link (not in sense of a hyperlink only) between package doc and the package itself. Will thinking about peardoc2, i played with flatter and deeper TOCs, the current way is IMO the best compromiss.