Re: Re[2]: [PEAR] [QF] - add rule - callback rule using built-in/registered rule inside

<Sebastian.Baran@dialcom.com.pl> wrote : > > > Tuesday, January 27, 2004, 11:40:20 AM, you wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Sebastian Baran [mailto:Sebastian.Baran@dialcom.com.pl] >>> >>> I want to create custom callback rule. But part of it's functionality >>> is going to be the same as one of built-in rules. My question is - is >>> it possible to call built-in rule from my callback function? Or >>> do I have to rewrite built-in rule functionality by hand in my >>> function? > > MC> Depending on exactly what your rule is going to do, > MC> could you not add the rules in the right order, so that the built-in one > is > MC> called before your custom callback one? > > MC> - Mike > > > Well, I didn't think about it this way. It's good idea - I'll try to > put two rules instead of one complex rule. This will be sufficient for > most cases. > > But if I would like to have just one rule to overwrite error messages > generated by two rules and display just one error message? For > example: > - one rule - built-in 'email' to initially check if email is ok > - second rule - callback to check something more complex (for example > if email is in DB or something). > > Is it good way to do it? Can I put both rules into one callback rule > calling buil-in rule first? I don't see any reason why you would want to do that ? Bertrand Mansion Mamasam