Re: Re: DB_DataObject joinAdd

It has nothing to do with the new features. It's just a wasy to distinguish the fields from the DB from options. Since this is an encapsulating object, it needs such a difference. On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:13:30 +0200, Bertrand Mansion <bmansion@mamasam.com> wrote: > > > Justin Patrin wrote: > > >On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:19:39 +0800, Alan Knowles <alan@akbkhome.com> wrote: > >> Daniel Kopp wrote: > >> > Alan Knowles wrote: > >> > which seems to work even though I am pretty sure it will break in > >> > php5 (there is protected mode for object-properties in php5 isn't > >> > it?) > >> > >> DataObjects is a little odd in some respects, all the public (eg. non > >> _prefixed vars) are assumed to be available to be used as column names) > >> - so all other variables end up with _underscores, even though their > >> protection level may be public as well.. > >> > > > >We're running into this with FormBuilder as well. We're planning on > >using fb_varName for FormBuilder options in the DataObject. > > That's another example where the underscore looks stupid in regard to the new > features provided by PHP, don't you think ? > > Bertrand Mansion > Mamasam > > -- paperCrane --Justin Patrin--