RE: [PEAR] template, not template that is the problem.

From: Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:48:09 +0000
Subject: RE: [PEAR] template, not template that is the problem.
Groups: php.pear.general 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-general+get-18313@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I don't think I can begin a debate like this (mainly because it's hard to discuss seriously in an other language for me ^^), but I think (maybe I'm wrong) that this question depends of the size of the application. It's more easy to develop the two things apart even if it cost something for the integration. And by personnal experience, it doesn't cost anything to use template, but my experience is not very representative ^^ -----Message d'origine----- De : symbulos partners [mailto:partners@symbulos.com] Envoyé : jeudi 24 mars 2005 17:43 À : pear-general@lists.php.net Objet : [PEAR] template, not template that is the problem. Dear friends, thanks for all the advice from you gurus. I have moved the thread to the main group. I have changed the title. From what you said, from all the documentation / articles you suggested, there seems to be scarce utility in using templating engines even for mid to large scale application. So the best way forward seems to be using php with function / classes. Is that right? -- symbulos partners -.- symbulos - ethical services for your organisation http://www.symbulos.com -- PEAR General Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

« previous php.pear.general (#18313) next »