RE: [PEAR] template, not template that is the problem.
| From: | Lassiege Hugo | Date: | Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:48:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR] template, not template that is the problem. | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-general+get-18313@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I don't think I can begin a debate like this (mainly because it's hard to discuss
seriously in an other language for me ^^), but I think (maybe I'm wrong) that this question
depends of the size of the application. It's more easy to develop the two things apart even if
it cost something for the integration.
And by personnal experience, it doesn't cost anything to use template, but my experience is not
very representative ^^
-----Message d'origine-----
De : symbulos partners [mailto:partners@symbulos.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 24 mars 2005 17:43
À : pear-general@lists.php.net
Objet : [PEAR] template, not template that is the problem.
Dear friends,
thanks for all the advice from you gurus.
I have moved the thread to the main group. I have changed the title.
From what you said, from all the documentation / articles you suggested,
there seems to be scarce utility in using templating engines even for mid
to large scale application.
So the best way forward seems to be using php with function / classes.
Is that right?
--
symbulos partners
-.-
symbulos - ethical services for your organisation
http://www.symbulos.com
--
PEAR General Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php