Re: Suggestion for new Quickform htmltextarea element AND fckeditor
| From: | Dan Rossi | Date: | Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:35:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestion for new Quickform htmltextarea element AND fckeditor | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.pear.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-general+get-21364@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Yeh as I was saying, it freakily seems to work, but xinha is loaded differently, and as Gorgon suggested not worry with an element and just add it to js in the header. I kinda like the idea of an element for ease of implementation etc etc. Ill take a look but someone please post source code if they are also onto it :D
On 11/10/2005, at 10:01 PM, Jan Wagner wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 11.10.2005, 21:01 +1000 schrieb Dan Rossi:Don't know if the configuration of xinha changed much, but this used to work quite well. I just don't use it anymore as it didnt seem to be maintained anymore, which makes sense, now that I know of xinha. Could you check if this works like xinha? Then it should be no problem.Ok i ran the test upon both htmlarea and xinha the element loads xinha perfectly, however when i went to register the imagebrowser plugin it broke. The second textarea also doesnt come up both both xinha and htmlarea in firefox on osx.Well, this looks quite promising. Over here with firefox on Linux both of the elements show up. It could be that plugin loading differs these days from last year, which prevents imagebrowser plugin from working right away. Having a quick look at the examples from xinha, does show some differences in plugin and config loading. Especially creating multiple instances looks different. One would have to test that out, as you cant do javascript stuff in the page header with quickform. So do you want to step forward and reimplement the element for xinha? Jan -- PEAR General Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php